27 / February
27 / February
2009 - 25 =

A New Era of Responsibility. War Is Peace. Slavery Is Freedom. Ignorance Is Strength.

posted at 12:09 AM
Comments

Stay away from that young woman in the lunch room! She's a plant! Trust me on this!!! lol

Posted by: Billiam on February 27, 2009 10:31 AM

I can't wait to hear asdf's "see I told you, he's a socialist" comment without fully grasping what this document says. Way to take the lead on this one Flynstone in promoting the exaggerative argument.

Isn't it ironic that 1984 was actually about an anti-liberal, anti-intellectual fascist government bent on the preservation of war, kinda like the modern republican party?

Posted by: I see red on February 27, 2009 11:57 AM

I remember in college and my brief accounting career having to read the IRS tax code.

That was easier than reading this.

Am I the only one who thinks they make this crap hard to read so that the average folks can't decipher it?

Be well,

Sponge

Posted by: SpongeDaddy on February 27, 2009 12:02 PM

No, I don't think that Obama is a Socialist at all. I think he's a Marxist and an ardent follower of Saul Alinsky.

And if you think that there was Fascism in 1984, wait until O and his puppeteers start subverting and skirting the Constitution as they've already started doing.

Posted by: asdf on February 27, 2009 03:30 PM

"...wait until O and his puppeteers start subverting and skirting the Constitution..."

You mean there is some politician outside of Ron Paul who HASN'T done this the past several decades?

Posted by: Eric F. Langborgh on February 27, 2009 03:34 PM

Slightly maybe. And potentially to provide protection and security for the United States and the citizens contained therein.

But you ain't seen nothing yet and O has hit the ground running as the "Constitutional Lawyer" who really doesn't understand the Constitution and demonstrates that he really doesn't care about it. Because, as O himself has said, it is "a charter of negative liberties".

Starting today with his party's direct assault on the first amendment and his upcoming direct assault on the second amendment through his attorney general, he will make other Executives (except maybe for FDR) look like pikers with regard to corrupting our most treasured national guidelines.

Consider Obama's appointments of White House “czars” to oversee federal policy, constituting a power grab from the Chief Executive. He is in the process of creating White House offices on health reform, urban affairs policy, energy and climate change. And the consolidation of power with the abduction of the Census from the Commerce Department that will now be run by White House Chicago thug Rahm Emanuel is somewhat concerning.

This is clearly an affront to the Constitutional system of checks and balances. At the worst, White House staff have taken direction and control of programmatic areas that are the responsibility of Senate-confirmed officials.

As far as how Ron Paul would have handled things if he had become President, we'll never know will we? Would have been interesting to see how he would have handled things.

Posted by: asdf on February 27, 2009 04:08 PM

Here is a fantastic post that is truly a must read, from Mike "Mish" Shedlock of SitkaPacific Capital Management at his Global Economic Trend An-alysis blog: "Dear Mr. President, With All Due Respect ...."

http://tinyurl.com/bs7mwo

Posted by: Eric F. Langborgh on February 27, 2009 04:23 PM

That was a really good piece.

Posted by: asdf on February 27, 2009 05:57 PM

I notice in the document there is a graph titled "Turning Surpluses into Deficits". A search of the Dept of Revenue will demonstrate that there never was a surplus as they mendaciously claim during the Clinton years, only a reduction in the deficit. Why would I put any trust in a document which knowingly published lies?

What the Clinton Administration claimed was that had conditions continued there might have been a surplus within 4 years. This of course ignored the fact the economy was already on the way down by late 1999 and doesnt even bring into account the false accounting used (by both parties) which adds in the so called Social Security Reserve to attempt to balance the budget when in fact Social Security is nothing but an IOU.

But the fictitious "Clinton Surplus" has already been etched into the Lefts Articles of Faith and most Democrats take it as gospel.

Posted by: M Colins on February 27, 2009 11:15 PM

Stock market keeps plummeting, O's handler Axelrod says he doesn't care, but they'll be naming their Healthcare 'Czar' (appropriate eh, comrade?) today. Good news is the O's approval numbers are down. Maybe, just maybe, people are waking up from their 'Hope' and 'Change' slumber.

Posted by: asdf on March 2, 2009 12:14 PM

http://blog-trader.ru ?? ???????? ????? ?????? ????????? ?? ?????? ????????? ?? ??????

Posted by: ?????????? ?????? on March 2, 2009 02:33 PM

"Wall Street tumbles anew as financials slide

Dow breaks 7,000 for first time since '97 as AIG gets more gov't funding, posts $61.7B loss"

How do you like them apples! And note this correlation..

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/03/obama_the_wealth_destroyer.html

Posted by: Thomas on March 2, 2009 03:26 PM

Hey gang, Obama has decided that student loans will be assessed and administered by the White House and the fiats there of.

So, if you've got kids and you don't live in downtown Detroit or Washington D.C., you'd better have some cash saved if you want little Johnny to get a college edumacation.

Posted by: Thomas on March 2, 2009 07:00 PM

From 11/4/08 thru 3/3/09 - > 3000 points.

Posted by: asdf on March 3, 2009 12:22 PM
Posted by: Greg on March 3, 2009 06:00 PM

"From 11/4/08 thru 3/3/09 - > 3000 points."

Yep, scary bad. The bubble has burst and now the balloon is being eaten.

From 10/12/07 thru 11/20/08 - > 6514 points.

Posted by: Eric F. Langborgh on March 3, 2009 06:38 PM

Exactly Eric. Even a Bush hater like you can't seriously reconcile the dramatic drop in the Dow without considering (at least) that it has more to do with Obama than any other natural or human occurrence or disaster.

At the end of September when O's numbers were going up and the media was predicting a Democratic victory, the market was at 10k and quickly started to loose ground. Businesses and the Market were and are (justifiably) scared $hiteless of this guy.

Saying anything else is for entertainment purposes only and disingenuous, to say the least.

Posted by: asdf on March 3, 2009 07:07 PM

It takes an unbelievable case of Obama Derangement Syndrome to attribute all woes of the past 6 months to Obama. That and an astounding lack of economic understanding.

For the rest of us, we find more than enough real things about Obama's disastrous program without having to invent objections. The inventions detract from real, reasonable objections. And some of us are out here actually doing something - actively - to fight the Obama agenda. We don't have to divine hidden motives or read Obama back into Bush's legacy to do so.

Posted by: Eric F. Langborgh on March 3, 2009 07:42 PM

From 10/12/07 thru 9/17/08 - > 3483 points.

Posted by: Eric F. Langborgh on March 3, 2009 07:46 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?