For years, Americans watched Harry Thomason's television shows. Now, the TV producer wants to watch you.
Hollywood "Friend of Bill" Harry Thomason appeared on Deborah Norville's MSNBC program tonight, exemplifying the liberal impulse to run everyone else's lives.
Thomason complained that corporations owning media outlets actually want to make money. "I'm not sure that the FCC shouldn't require it--that news should not make a profit," Thomason pontificated. He continued to excoriate the public for their choices in where they get their news (read: Fox News Channel). "There may be a period where we have to teach the public what they should be watching," Thomason opined.
Who decides what we 'should' be watching? The man who gave us Designing Women, of course.
Liberals know best. They think they can spend your money better than you can. When you make the wrong policy choices at the ballot box, they're there to correct you through the courts. If you own a gun, they want to take it away. (It's for your own good, you know.) They'll determine what school your children attend, where you're permitted to say the Pledge of Allegiance, and whether you can smoke in a bar.
And now, liberals like Thomason want to decide what I watch on television. No thanks, but I think I'll keep the remote.
Surprise, surprise: Dan thinks he'll keep the remote.
Dan doesn't let ME touch the remote, so he better not give it to "Big Brother Harry Thomason" either.
(If Thomason's totalitarianism got rid of the human stink bomb Howard Stern, it may be worth it. More likely he would get rid of the delightful Shepherd Smith.)
Mr. Flynn:
Have you considered an article either on your website or in another meida outlet, on the U.S.Senate race in New York state this year. The pundits have already ceded the race to Chuck Schumer, a man who never met photo op he passed up, and a man who is more than willing to defy the Constitution, in order to deny federal judicial spots to men and women whose only disqualification in his eyes is their commitment to religion, life and the use of case law and statutes in place of judicial activism. Pataki and his woefully disgraceful regular Republican party have offered Schumer a sacrificial goat in the form of an obscure Assemblyman, who has no money from the party. However, the Conservative party declined to be the tail of the Republican dog this year, and has put up a physician Marilyn O'Grady. If she goes after Schumer for his radical liberalism, anti-Catholicism and anti-constitutional activities, it could be an interesting race, especially outside the liberal precints of Ny City and Westchester County. We have been in the forefront of the fight to end the judicial filibuster, but got no cooperati[o from Sens. Frist and Hatch. Both men sacrificed a leading Republican staffer on the Judiciary Cmmtte., to appease the radical Democrats.
Six successive Time-Life CNN polls have found that the vast majority of New Yorkers oppose one or more forms of abortion. Sadly, too few of thes people ever vote anymore.
Best regards,
Seamus O'Riann
Co-Founder/Research Director
"Legal Advocates for Life."
P.S. We are notyour usual respect for life org. as we cover over twen;y other life issues, in addition to abortion, and use the law and social science research to link all these issues.
