
Shouldn't an attempt to kill your child in the womb be ample grounds for the state to judge a couple "unfit parents"? Lewis Percival survived the saline harpoons, chemical weapons, and vacuums of the abortionist to ultimately escape from the world's most dangerous place last November. Depending upon the way you look at it, he left his mother's body three weeks premature or twenty-five weeks late. "I was on the [birth control pill] when I became pregnant," England's Jodie Percival noted of her abortion gone wrong, er, I mean right. "Deciding to terminate at eight weeks was just utterly horrible but I couldn't cope with the anguish of losing another baby." Help me with the logic here. I couldn't cope with the anguish of losing another baby so I attempted to kill my baby.
Why does the confusion surprise?
Here's some more tortured logic: it's legal to attempt to murder the baby while inside the womb, but the next day (after the baby's miraculous survival), it's illegal to attempt to murder the baby. So the baby's legal right to life is based on geography.



