When Australians riot against Muslims, white racism is to blame. When Muslims riot against France, white racism is to blame.
Dan, there was an article on FrontPage Magazine, "Muslim Gang Rapes and the Aussie Riots," By Sharon Lapkin. I can't seem to find it there now, but I found a similar blog on the subject: http://www.iris.org.il/blog/archives/757-Pan-European-Arab-Muslim-Gang-Rape-Epidemic.html
The "official" press reports on the Australian riots completely ignore the underlying motive for the attack on the Lebanese gangs by angry crowds of white Australian youths. It seems Australia is not alone in being victimzed by gangs of Muslim rapists. Of course, it wouldn't be "nice" to acknowledge that this is the underlying cause, so "white racism" will have to suffice.
Gary, I read the same original report, which has not been cited in any of the more recent articles I've read. Strange how these inconvenient facts have a way of disappearing from the MSM! I would be curious how the Australian media is treating this story.
I'm sure they're treating it pretty much the same way, Thom, i.e., they're blaming it on "white racists" and pondering the "mystery" of how it all began, despite the growing evidence of these Muslim rapists all over the world. Even Fox News has taken a similar track and it's no surprise since their parent company is owned by an Aussie media billionaire.
Why is it that when white's riot to protect themselves and theirs it's called rascism but when minority groups do it it's because they are 'oppressed'? And that's ok.
Insane.
asdf eats the turds ofCheney
Why is it that when whites respond to these posts, they make sense??
To get back to the topic, there is an excellent and revealing article in the December 5th issue of American Conservative magazine, "The Battle for France," by Paul Belien, who exposes how Muslim immigrants have been taking over France in recent years - and how the French are letting them do it.
Gary, we are on topic as this post was meant to discuss white racism.
Although your post is worthy of discussion, it was only slightly relevant to the topic that when whites do violence, it's labeled as racism where it is not necessarily so called when others groups or races do violence for the same (or for far less significant) reasons.
asdf,
whites are seen by the retrograde as a privileged class and, therefore, burdened with a noblesse oblige that dictates a subservient response to any act of aggression. The opposite is true of non-white or non-Christian-Jewish groups. It is all based upon realities that have ceased as of, oh, 1970 or so, hence "retrograde."
Well, for starters, the supposed Muslim rape-gangs (in Sydney) weren't actually Muslim, but we are talking race not religion.
The rioting in Sydney began with white racists attacking women, men and children of middle eastern descent. The racist sentiment in certain parts of Sydney (Cronulla particularly) has been buliding up for a while and the idea that the attacks by three youths upon life guards is justification for rioting is ludicrous (some of the local media have been trying to excuse the thugs). The act certainly was premeditated racism, you just need to see the SMSs that were passed around (and repeated on radio before the act) to realise that (meet at X to do X to Lebos).
Of course, the respondent racism from some of the Lebonese community in Sydney was also racist and disgusting. Like the violence of the initial riots, there was no justification (the responce was dispropotionate and even if it was proportionate would not be justified.)
These crimes are still being investigated, so there is a limit to the conclusions one can make. However, the circulated SMS (organised premeditated violence against a racial group) is evidence enough of racism.
Politicians (including our PM John Howard) have been to afraid to call a spade a spade but fortunately, the gangs (white and Lebo) themselves have admitted to the racism and are making attempts to stamp it out (which seem to have had some positive effect).
The underlying racism has been an issue for ages (forming the basis for local TV shows like "Pizza") so at least the community has been able to admit it for a long time. The condemnation of the racial violence (on both sides) by the Bra Boys and the Lebonese community shows they are willing to deal with it.
What is pathetic in the aftermath, is mainly the media responce; a certain journalist will take a side and then exagerate the opponents violence while apologising and downplaying the violence of the gang they seem to be favoring.
In the Australian press, most credible commentary is being reserved, although some columnist are diving in to defend thugs of various ilk.
Still, I'm waiting for more commentary from more journos, and a final report on the riots
before I start making a detailed commentary. The media coverage thus far won't go away.
It would appear that denouncing mob violence is always appropriate in a democratic society. Filling in the gaps with stories of how and why will be interesting, but legal recourse is the only proper response to crime and injustice.
Until it becomes something more than mere mob violence, Webster. When it evolves into something of the scope we just saw in France, recently - or worse - it may require national guard troops. I believe understanding the causes is paramount to doing something about it. Note the initial French response: utter bewilderment.
I think what we're seeing are some of the inevitable effects of what Pat Buchanan was addressing in his book, "The Death of the West," which discusses the coming influx of immigrants (especially from Islamic nations) into the western nations, where the population is aging and will dying off in the future. He suggests that this influx of immigration is deliberate and is aimed at inundating the societies being invaded.
In America, we're facing a similar threat from Mexico. There are actually organized groups in Mexico whose objective is "retake" those portions of the United States that were once Mexico's territory. There means of doing so: waves of illegal immigrants.
